Recent Articles with Public Policy Implications

From Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 19, #6.

 

Fact and Fiction in Cognitive Ability Testing for Admissions and Hiring Decisions 
Nathan R. Kuncel and Sarah A. Hezlett
Standardized tests of cognitive abilities are used to predict performance in educational and work settings. Group differences often occur with standardized cognitive tests, and these differences have been falsely attributed to predictive biases inherent to the tests. Although evidence suggests that test-score differences reflect developed-skill differences, it is important for scientists, citizens, and policymakers to critically examine these tests and their uses, due to the important implications they have for school and job placement.

Alternative Avenues in the Assessment of Driving Capacities in Older Drivers and Implications for Training 
Pierre-Luc Gamache, Carol Hudon, Normand Teasdale, and Martin Simoneau
Skilled driving relies on the brain transforming multiple sensory inputs into correct motor actions (e.g., stepping on the brake when approaching a red light). Many tests currently used to identify at-risk drivers (e.g., elderly adults) examine individual sensory functions. Driving simulators, which test all aspects of driving behavior, may be most effective in training and improving drivers' skills. These methods that combine sensory and action processes may be beneficial in helping to keep older drivers behind the wheel longer without compromising road safety.

Tobacco Dependence: Insights from Investigations of Self-Reported Motives 
Thomas M. Piasecki, Megan E. Piper, and Timothy B. Baker
Tobacco dependence is related to the strength of tobacco addiction and may help to explain why some smokers use tobacco so heavily. The Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives is a survery that assesses 13 dimensions of smoking motivation. Analysis of these dimensions suggests that heavy smokers may have different motivations to smoke than do lighter smokers. For example, heavy smokers may not smoke because of the consequences of smoking (e.g., experiencing pleasure from smoking) but because smoking behavior occurs automatically.