Sociology 390: Senior Seminar in Sociology
Spring 2010
Website: http://employees.oneonta.edu/thomasa/
Instructor: Alex Thomas |
Office: 14C SCHU |
Office Hours: MW 2-4; and by app’t |
Phone: 436-2149 |
Class: Monday 4:00-6:30; FITZ 218 |
Email: thomasa@oneonta.edu |
Course Description & Objectives
This is the senior level capstone course for the Liberal Arts Sociology major. By the end of this course, the student will have a full understanding of the application of sociological theory to contemporary issues.
1. You are expected to attend all classes and read all assigned materials. You may expect to be tested on all assigned reading whether or not discussed in class. Similarly, materials discussed in class but not in the assigned reading should also be expected on exams.
Students Diagnosed with a Disability
All individuals who are diagnosed with a disability are protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. As such, you may be entitled to certain accommodations within this class. If you are diagnosed with a disability, please make an appointment to meet with Student Disability Services (SDS), 209 Alumni Hall, ext. 2137. All students with the necessary supporting documentation will be provided appropriate accommodations as determined by the SDS Office.
It is entirely your responsibility to contact SDS and concurrently supply me with your accommodation plan, which will inform me exactly what accommodations you are entitled to. You will only receive accommodations once you provide me with an SDS accommodation plan.
Any previously recorded grades will not be changed.
Assignment |
Counts toward |
Date Due |
Presentation 1 |
Participation |
TBA |
Presentation 2 |
Participation |
TBA |
Weekly Questions |
Participation |
Ongoing |
Paper Topic |
Paper |
Feb. 8 |
Literature Review |
Paper |
Mar. 22 |
Final Paper |
Paper |
Apr. 26 |
Class Participation |
Participation |
Ongoing |
PACKET: Packet of Readings; HUXLEY: Brave New World; ORWELL: 1984
Class Presentations
Each member of the class will present material from two of the readings to the class and lead the discussion for both of those sessions. Topics will be decided in class. Visual aids are not necessary and presentations are to be informal. However, each presenter should prepare an outline of the readings for each respective day and make photocopies (at their own expense) for each member of the class, including the instructor. Missing a presentation will result in a reduction of the grade and the presentation will have to be made at the following class. This assignment is worth a combined fifty percent of the Participation grade.
Schedule
Begin Date |
Read: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Jan. 20 |
We did not meet |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Jan 25 |
Introduction to Course |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Feb 1 |
PACKET: Maryanski & Turner; Leibowitz |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Feb 8 |
PACKET: Blumer; Freud |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
PAPER TOPICS DUE Feb. 8 IN CLASS |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Feb 15 |
PACKET: Goffman; Durkheim |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Feb 22 |
WINTER BREAK |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mar 1 |
PACKET: Berger & Luckmann; Collins |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mar 8 |
HUXLEY: Brave New World |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mar 15 |
HUXLEY – Brave New World |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mar 22 |
PACKET: Weber I; Marx |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
LITERATURE REVIEW DUE Mar. 22 IN CLASS |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mar 29 |
PACKET: O’Conner; Domhoff |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Apr 5 |
SPRING BREAK |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Apr 12 |
PACKET: Weber II; Strauss; NOT Granovetter; Ormerod |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Apr 19 |
PACKET: Herman & Chomsky; Staples |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Apr 26 |
ORWELL – 1984 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
PAPERS DUE APR 26 IN CLASS |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
May 3 |
ORWELL – 1984 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
May 10 |
FILM & Class Discussion |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Final Exam Period @ 4:00 PM Monday May 17, 2010 Attendance and Participation is Mandatory.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Class Participation
This is a seminar class. A seminar class is only as effective as it is lively. As such, please note that participation is a sizable portion of the grade. I will be keeping notes during each class. The grade will be determined by your overall participation in class during the semester as well as your performance on weekly questions, as noted below. As life is life, you can miss one week of assignments – that is, one class – before penalty.
Weekly Questions: Based on the reading, write a question that addresses one or more concepts discussed. The question should have background information and/or an explanation of the relevant passages in the reading. The question can also seek comparison or any other intellectual (and sociological) theme as discussed in the reading. In other words, a question is not a sentence but is rather a paragraph. The idea is to generate a series of questions that can be picked and address by the remainder of the class for discussion. You should keep your name on the question when you submit it, but it will stripped from the question when they are all compiled into one class sheet.
Submitting Questions: Questions should be submitted via Angel by 10:00 PM on the Sunday night prior to class.
Grading Questions: Questions will be graded on the five point scale. A 5 will be a question that is intellectually challenging and/or probing of the material, and may or may not reference past readings, current events, or other facets of social science theory. A 3 will be a decent question that simply does not warrant a 5. In order to receive these grades, the question must be turned in on time. Questions deserving of the above grades turned in late will automatically receive a 1. An inferior (e.g., one or two sentences) question received late or not at all will receive no credit.
Learning Question Grades: Questions will not be returned. If you want a grade, you should check your Angel account.
Research Paper
Each member of the class is required to conduct research on a topic of their own choice, but subject to approval of the instructor. The research must be conducted on a sociological topic. The paper must be written in a formal style. As a college senior, the quality of research and writing should be of the same approximate quality that would be expected of a professional sociologist. The paper will be reviewed in three stages, as shown below. All papers must be typed or word processed, double-spaced, and stapled or otherwise secured.
Paper topic: Write a one to two paragraph proposal of your research topic, including the methods you plan to use, ethical issues, sampling issues, and any other relevant information. You are free to use any credible research method, but you should remember that you are going to be required to actually conduct this research. As such, your project must be doable, and you must have a plan for finishing this research during the course of the semester. It is recommended that you consider a historical-comparative, secondary data analysis, or content analysis study because they more readily lend themselves to the permitted timeframe, but it is your choice.
Due: February 8, 2010 in class
Literature Review: Conduct a thorough review of the research literature on your topic. This should include a discussion of relevant theoretical issues, past research, and possible public policy/political debates centering on this topic. You should cover all major angles and be as non-biased as possible. Lengths will vary depending on your topic, but it is difficult to believe that a credible research topic will lend itself to a literature review and theoretical discussion of less than ten pages. For certain research methods, such as Historical-Comparative research, this will comprise the largest single portion of the final paper. For others, this section maybe shorter but that will be offset by the fact that the research itself must still be conducted.
Due: March 22, 2010 in class
Methods Section: This assignment is required of all students regardless of topic. The methods section is a statement of how the research is to be conducted. This includes provisions of sampling, sampling frames, database acquisition, and all other information relevant to other researchers in terms of replicating your study. For research oriented projects, such as a content analysis or secondary data analysis, this section should be fairly detailed, including such factors as where the data was obtained, relative merits of the method over other methods, etc. For historical-comparative research and theoretical papers, this should include a discussion of sources and viewpoints, but in practice the final paper may incorporate this material in a section other than a method section.
Due with Final Paper
Final Paper: This is the complete account of your research. The paper should be structured as follows:
Introduction: Describes the project, including any scientific, political, or policy debates surrounding the topic.
Literature Review: Overview of relevant theories and past research regarding the topic. In addition, debates taking place on empirical grounds should be discussed in the section.
Method: This is required of papers that are neither historical-comparative nor theoretical in focus. This section describes in detail the research methods utilized and the advantages or disadvantages. This includes provisions of sampling, sampling frames, database acquisition, and all other information relevant to other researchers in terms of replicating your study.
Findngs: Again, this section is most appropriate to research driven studies that are not historical-comparative. This should include the basic findings of the study, including qualitative descriptions and quantitative testing where appropriate.
Discussion & Conclusion: This section should contain any conclusions from the study, such as interpretations of the significance of the data and ramifications for future research. Policy ramifications and social implications can also be discussed here. This is the one piece of the paper that can be used as a soapbox of sorts, but your remarks must be grounded in the research literature and/or the findings of this study. Do not rely on “common sense” as the arbiter of your remarks as things are often not as obvious as we assume.
Due: April 26, 2010 in class